The original tower
33 Harbour Square went up as part of the waterfront's first major redevelopment wave in the 1970s, the same era that brought the Westin Harbour Castle hotel and Harbour Square Park to this stretch of the water, all developed under the Campeau Corporation. It's the building most people picture when they hear "Harbour Square", even though two more towers, Harbourside and One York Quay, later joined the same complex under the same name.
Suites here run from around 550 up to 2,150 square feet, with some of the larger units built as two-level layouts, genuinely rare in a building this age. Maintenance fees are relatively low for the amenity level on offer, and residents consistently describe the building as efficiently managed.
Suite mix
One and two-bedroom layouts dominate, with several two-level penthouse units offering a genuinely different living experience than a standard single-floor suite. Many owners have renovated into thoroughly modern interiors, so don't assume a 1970s building means dated units, ask for recent renovation history on the specific suite you're considering.
Fees & what to verify
This building's age means the reserve fund study deserves real attention, same as any 1970s structure. The building has a reputation for efficient management and relatively low fees for what it offers, but "relatively low" only means something once you've seen the actual reserve fund numbers for yourself.
Amenities & location
- Indoor pool, two squash courts, a gym, and a yoga room
- A library, children's playroom, and party room
- A rooftop terrace beside the pool with gardens and BBQ space
- Steps from Harbour Square Park, the Jack Layton Ferry Terminal, and the Westin Harbour Castle via glass walkway
Who it suits
Buyers who want genuine space, some of the larger two-level layouts feel more like a townhouse than a condo, without paying for a brand-new building's premium. It suits people comfortable doing real diligence on an older building's systems in exchange for square footage and a well-run board. Less ideal if you want the certainty of current-code construction with no history to review.